Shankar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.93 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2017 Thana -SC/ST District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Shankar Yadav, Son of Somaru Yadav, Resident of Village- Kushi Tola, Police Station- Karakat (Godari), District- Rohtas. .... .... Appellant
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rang Nath Choubey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Schedule Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum Special Judge, S.C.S.T. Court, Rohtas, in connection with S.C./S.T. P.S. Case No.56 of 2017, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 354, 379,504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(i)(r)(s)(w)(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Considering the nature of allegation for offence allegedly committed under the Indian Penal Code as well as under the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.93 of 2018 (3) dt.08-02-2018 2/2 (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, as discloses in the F.I.R, in my view, the appellant deserves regular bail.
Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Amit/- U T