Prince Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71082 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2024 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Prince Kumar Singh S/o Om Prakash Singh R/o Village - Natwar Parashuram, P.S - Manjhi, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Suman Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 146 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 127(2), 309(4), 338, 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 which was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 21.02.2025 passed by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 83060 of 2024 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of custody of six months.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. It has further been submitted by learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71082 of 2025(2) dt.17-10-2025 2/2 the petitioner that save and except the recovery of vehicle i.e. BR01HJ4865 which was allegedly used in the alleged occurrence, there is nothing against the petitioner. It has further submitted that co-accused, namely, Aditya Kumar whose bail petition was earlier rejected by this Court along with this petitioner vide order dated 21.02.2025 has already been granted bail by this Court itself vide order dated 19.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 67494 of 2025. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 12.07.2024.

4. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 146 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T