← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77015/2024bail granted

Jai Ram Sah @ Sonu Sah @ Jai Jai Ram Sah @ Jay Ram Sah @ Sonoo Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77015 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1043 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE District- Saharsa ====================================================== Jai Ram Sah @ Sonu Sah @ Jai Jai Ram Sah @ Jay Ram Sah @ Sonoo Sah Son of Triveni Sah village- Shahpur, Ps- Sonbarsa Raj, Dist- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rani Devi Wife of Jay Ram Sah @ Sonoo Sah village- Shahpur, PsSonbarsa Raj, Dist- Saharsa P/A- Village- Basauna, Ps- Bangaon, DistSaharsa ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari, A.P.P.

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 Pursuant to order of this Court, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Center of Patna High Court, but the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation and as such, mediation failed (Report kept at flag 'M').

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the opposite party no.2.

3. The petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no.2, apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498A, 494 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act.

4. Prosecution case in brief is that opposite party no.2 was married with the petitioner on 23.6.2023. After marriage, this petitioner along with other accused persons demanded Rs 2 lacs in dowry and on non-fulfillment of the same they used to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77015 of 2024(4) dt.21-03-2025 2/3 assault and torture her. Lastly, accused persons ousted opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial house.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, while denying the allegations, submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case because he happens to be husband of opposite party no.2. Petitioner is ready to keep her with honour and safety. Besides this, petitioner is ready to give Rs. 3000/-per month to opposite party no.2 by way of temporary relief/solace, starting from this month, subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings.

6. Learned counsel for the State as well as opposite party no.2 oppose the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioner, being husband of opposite party no.2, in connivance with his family members, subjected her to harassment and cruelty for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and also ousted her to her parents' house. It is further submitted that out of the wedlock she has three children and she no means of livelihood and is on the verge of starvation.

7. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner as well as condition of opposite party no.2, provisional bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 14.11.2024 is hereby confirmed, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:- (i) Opposite party no.2. would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner. (ii) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid interim relief per month in the saving bank account of the opposite party

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77015 of 2024(4) dt.21-03-2025 3/3 no.2.

(iii) In case, petitioner fails to deposit the aforesaid amount of temporary relief/solace for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond. (iv) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T