Tinku Kumar Singh @ Tinku Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73858 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Munger ====================================================== TINKU KUMAR SINGH @ TINKU KUMAR Son of Jawahar Singh Resident of Village - Maheshpur, P.S.- Tarapur, District - Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Indu Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant.

The petitioner who is husband of informant apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A/307/34 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner offers and undertakes that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/-per month, starting from this month to the informant.

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- per month, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Munger in Munger Mahila Police Station Case No. 36 of 2021, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73858 of 2022(2) dt.06-04-2023 2/2 the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:-

(1) informant would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the informant.

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T