← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4294/2017disposed

Bishnukant Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-11-25Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

(FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION) Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4294 of 2017 ====================================================== Bishnukant Jha, S/o late Ghuran Jha, Resident of Mohalla- Bankers Colony, Gali No.-5, Mithanpura, P.S.- Mithanpura, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Labour Resources, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Labour Resources, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Labour Commissioner, Department of Labour Resources, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Director (Agriculture Labour), Department of Labour Resources, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, 5.

The Deputy Labour Commissioner (Agriculture Labour), Department of Labour Resources, I.T.I. Campus, Ganipur, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh-GP26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-11-2020 Today, once again no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

On 18.05.2020 when the matter was called out, learned counsel for the petitioner had informed this Court that the petitioner has already filed a writ application challenging the final order passed by the Labour Commissioner, however, the writ application number was not available with him. On the next date i.e. 13.08.2020 no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, learned G.P.-26 informed this Court that

Patna High Court CWJC No.4294 of 2017(6) dt.25-11-2020 2/2 the final order of punishment has already been passed and the admitted post retiral dues has also been paid to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, the case was adjourned for final disposal after start of normal functioning of the Court or on 3rd November, 2020 whichever is earlier.

Today, once again no one has appeared for the petitioner.

Finding that the petitioner is not taking interest in the writ application and now he has already filed a fresh writ application against the punishment order, this Court thinks it just and proper to dispose of this writ application as not pressed. This application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) vats/- U Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.