← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17286/2018rejected

Jhun Jhun Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-04-25Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17286 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -142 Year- 2015 Thana -SULTANGANJ District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Jhun Jhun Singh S/o Harkhit Singh, R/o Village- Tilakpur, P.S.- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by orders dated 14.07.2016 and 28.06.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 23094of 2016 and 24652 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 02.11.2015, no offence under section 307 of the I.P.C. is made out as there is no allegation for repeating the firing, the trial has not been concluded within four months and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail of the petitioner by submitting that on the vital part firearm injury has been caused by the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17286 of 2018 (3) dt.25-04-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail, again prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with S.T. No. 439 of 2016 arising out of Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 142 of 2015 pending in the court of 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur.

However, the learned trial court is again directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T