Naresh Kumar Goyal, v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21203 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Naresh Kumar Goyal, son of Late Vishwanath Prasad Goyal, resident of C/o Maa Shakambari Travel, Station Road, besides Seema Honda Showroom, Near Devi Asthan, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya. 2.

Arun Kumar Singh, son of Sri Ambika Singh, resident of village- Kenduai, P.S.- A.N. Magadh Medical College, Gaya, District- Gaya. 3.

Somnath Tiwari, son of Late Jugal Kishore Tiwari, resident of North Lakhibagh, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India New Delhi.

2.

The Secretary, Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The State Transport Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 5.

The Collector, Gaya.

6.

The Joint Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7.

The District Transport Officer, Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Anjani Kumar, AAG-4 For UoI :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, A.S.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-11-2019 The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :- ".....for issuance of direction upon the Respondents concerned o declare new amendment of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 is unconstitutional, void and not acted upon because the Section 110 of Motor Vehicle Act has power to make rules regarding to construction, equipment and

Patna High Court CWJC No.21203 of 2019(3) dt.19-11-2019 2/2 maintenance of the motor vehicle."

After some arguments, Mr. Arun Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file representation before the appropriate authority.

Permission granted.

As prayed for, the instant petition stands disposed as having been withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the appropriate authority which shall be disposed of within a period of three weeks, in accordance with law.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/DKS U