Purnendu Saran v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71089 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2017 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Purnendu Saran S/O Baidehi Saran Lal R/O- Mohalla- Shivpuri, P.SChandauti, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Soni Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-10-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 419, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that first installment of Indira Awas of Rs.37,500/- was given to such person who are not beneficiaries and the money is to be recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant being Indira Awas Sahayak. It is next submitted that money was credited in the account of such persons whose name

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71089 of 2025(2) dt.14-10-2025 2/3 was passed by the Aam Sabha under the chairmanship of Mukhiya. It is also submitted that it is the Aam Sabha which selects the beneficiaries. It is also submitted that Ranvijay Kumar had approached this court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.32053/2025 and the same was allowed by a learned coordinate Bench by an order dated 20.05.2025, further Meena Devi had also approached this court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.56185/2019 and the same was also allowed by the then learned coordinate Bench by an order dated 04.09.2019. It is next submitted that till date process under sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.S. has not been issued against the petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tekari P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71089 of 2025(2) dt.14-10-2025 3/3 No.72/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T