← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76357/2019dismissed

Alok Sah @ Alok Kumar Sah @ Alok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-06Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76357 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2019 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== ALOK SAH @ ALOK KUMAR SAH @ ALOK KUMAR S/o Ram Sagar Sah Resident of Village- Bishanpur, P.S.- Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Renuka Ratnakar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 06-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in this case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 62 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence, the injury caused on the victim is not on the vital part of the body. The informant has not seen the petitioner making firing rather someone disclosed the name of the petitioner. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein there is allegation that the petitioner had fired and in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76357 of 2019(5) dt.06-03-2020 2/2 course of investigation the witnesses have taken the name of the petitioner as the person who had fired during the procession, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer is thus, refused. In case, the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, his prayer for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T