Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71473 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2025 Thana- MOUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.
Amit Kumar S/O Sunil Kumar Sah R/O Village- Narayan Das Lane, P.SMojahidpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur. 2.
Abhishek Ranjan @ Abhishek Ranjan Abhishek S/O Sunil Kumar Sah R/O Village- Narayan Das Lane, P.S- Mojahidpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(5), 109, 352, 351(3), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As prosecution case, it is alleged that on 19.07.2025, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, abused and assaulted informant and his nephew by means of Khanti and iron rod as a result of which they sustained multiple injuries.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71473 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 2/3 have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, dispute arose between the parties over path way which led to simple maarpeet in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. IX, Bhagalpur in connection with Mojahidpur P.S. Case No. 87 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71473 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 3/3 the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T