Vishun Saw @ Vishun Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66287 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2019 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

VISHUN SAW @ VISHUN SAH S/o Late Shyam Lal Sah @ Shyalal Sah R/o village- Amin, P.S. and District- Jamui 2.

Jaldhar Saw @ Jadhar Sah S/o Vishun Saw @ Vishun Sah R/o villageAmin, P.S. and District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Jamui P. S. Case No. 280 of 2019, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 337, 307, 34 of IPC. As per F.I.R. petitioners are said to have assaulted the complainant by lathi, causing injury.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner no.1 is 73 years old person unable to move. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that the injury caused by petitioner no.2 is grievous in nature.

Having heard both sides, considering the above

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66287 of 2019(2) dt.22-10-2019 2/2 submissions, so far as, petitioner no.1, is concerned, considering the age of petitioner no.1, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamui, in connection with Jamui P. S. Case No. 280 of 2019, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as petitioner no.2, is concerned, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to him. However, he may surrender and pray for regular bail before the learned court below, the same shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by order of this Court. With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T