← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17534/2025disposed

Mahesh Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-02Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17534 of 2025 ====================================================== Mahesh Prasad Singh Son of Late Aditya Singh, Resident of villageJamuhari, P.S.- Mehandia, District- Arwal- 804408. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Regional Deputy Director, Health Services, Magadh Division, Gaya. 3.

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Jehanabad. 4.

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Arwal. 5.

The In-Charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Karpi, District Arwal.

6.

The In-charge Medical Officer, Additional Primary Health Centre, Sahar Telpa, District Arwal.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S.K.Thakur, Advocate Mr. Aditya Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh, AC to GP-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief(s):

"(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent authorities to dispose of the representation of the petitioner which has been filed for payment of salary but till date the respondent authorities neither has made payment the salary for the period 14.10.2009 to 23.01.2014 for which the petitioner has worked nor has disposed of the representation of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.17534 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 2/3 petitioner which has been filed in view of the order passed in CWJC No. 12268/2021.

(ii) And for any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is found to be entitled in the eye of law."

3. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ application be disposed of directing the respondents to decide the representation filed by the petitioner for the reliefs as stated herein above.

4. The writ application is disposed of directing the petitioner to file a representation before the Civil Surgeon-cumChief Medical Officer, Arwal/Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Jehanabad/respondent concerned within four weeks.

5. In case such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the respondent concerned shall decide the same within a period of two months.

6. Any amount found payable to the petitioner shall be paid within three months from the date of passing of the order disposing of the petitioner's representation.

7. In case the amount prayed for by the petitioner is not found admissible, a reasoned order for the same shall be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period.

8. It is made clear that the Court has not gone into the merits of the case of the petitioner which is to be decided by the respondent concerned.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17534 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 3/3

9. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations and directions.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U