← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67750/2019dismissed

Ajay Narayan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-05Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67750 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2019 Thana- AIRPORT District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Ajay Narayan Rai Son of Sri Janeshwar Rai Resident of Cantt Road, Rampur Garikhana,, P.S.- Khagaul, District- Patna 2.

Mithilesh Kumar Son of Gopal Prasad Singh Resident of Ram Charan Tola, Near Girls School, Barahiya, P.S.- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Baby Devi Wife of Shailesh Kumar Singh R/O Village - Khush Dihara, P.O. and P.S.- Paraiya, District- Gaya. At present residing at Quarter No. B/07, B.M.P. 05 Campus, P.S.- Hawai Adda, District- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunit Kumar Srivastava For the Informant : Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-03-2020 Heard counsel for the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 170 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is admitted that all the money has been returned to the informant and only Rs. 3,50,000/- is due from the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67750 of 2019(3) dt.05-03-2020 2/2 Counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

It appears from para 3 of the bail petition that there are three cases pending against these petitioners of similar nature.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that petitioners have criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners above-named on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T