Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69633/2019bail granted

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu @ Chhotu Rawani v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-18Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69633 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2019 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== SONU KUMAR @ SONU @ CHHOTU RAWANI Son of Vijay Prasad Resident of Mohalla-Bangla Asthan, Maharani Road, P.S-Kotwali, DistrictGaya At Present Katari Hill, P.S-Chandauti, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 12.03.2019 in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No. 126 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b) a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with the recovery of one loaded pistol from his possession. The petitioner has already suffered more than nine months in custody.

4. Be that as it may, considering the period of custody already suffered since 12.03.2019, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69633 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No. 126 of 2019, on the following conditions-- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T