Sudarshan Yadav @ Sudarshan Yadav Singh @ Sudarshan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65744 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2019 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Sudarshan Yadav @ Sudarshan Yadav Singh @ Sudarshan Singh, S/o Late Lalu Yadav @ Late Lalu Singh, Resident of Village- Nima, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-10-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Daudnagar Case No.205 of 2019, disclosing offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
As per F.I.R and the seizure list, there is recovery of 148.140 liters of foreign liquor from the hut situated in the filed of the petitioner.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the hut belongs to the son of the petitioner and both son and petitioner have been made accused in this case. He has no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that F.I.R. and seizure list both disclosed the recovery from the land of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65744 of 2019(2) dt.21-10-2019 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the allegation and the quantity of the liquor recovered from the shop of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, he may surrender and pray for regular bail, the learned court below shall consider the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the same will pass appropriate order, without being prejudiced by order of this Court.
With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T