Sanjay Kumar v. The Bihar State Housing Board Through Its Secretary And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3163 of 2017 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19230 of 2015 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar, Son of Late Mahatam Pandey, resident of village - Rajwara, P.O. Rajwara, Police Station Sahebganj, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Bihar State Housing Board through its Secretary, 6 Sardar Patel Marg, Patna-800015.
2.
Sri Anirudh Prasad Singh, the Secretary, Bihar State Housing Board, 6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna 800015.
3.
Sri Ajay Shankar Sahay, the Executive Engineer, Division office, Bihar State Housing Board, Damodarpur, Muzaffarpur.
4.
Sri Deepak Kumar, the Junior Engineer, office of the Executive Engineer, Division Office, Bihar State Housing Board, Damodarpur, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.
For the Housing Board :
Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate Ms. Binita Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 21-08-2019 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Ms. Binita Singh, learned counsel for the Bihar State Housing Board (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board') has assisted the Court.
2. The petitioner has moved the Court alleging non compliance of the order dated 09.02.2017 passed in CWJC No. 19230 of 2015.
3. Learned counsel for the Board from the show cause filed on their behalf submitted that the direction of the Court has
Patna High Court MJC No.3163 of 2017 dt.21-08-2019 2/2 been complied with and in fact, the additional cost of registration, which was to be borne by the petitioner has also been waived by the Board and the deed has been registered on 30.08.2018. Copy of the affidavit was served on learned counsel for the petitioner on 09.01.2019. There is no rejoinder to the same.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid, the Court finds that the opposite parties have complied with the direction of the writ Court.
5. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T