Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74999/2025bail rejected

Chunchun Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74999 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-314 Year-2024 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Chunchun Rai S/o Fakira Rai Residence of village- Bisonpur, Said Ali, Ward No.-11, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner committed murder of his own mother.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence and only on basis of suspicion, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since 19.06.2024. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedents.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74999 of 2025(2) dt.04-11-2025 2/2

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with other accused persons, committed murder of his mother. Informant is none else than father of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and specific and direct nature of accusation, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is rejected.

7. However, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 19.06.2024, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same, at the earliest, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T