Subodh Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1863 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12519 of 2017 ====================================================== Subodh Tiwari Son of Tarkeshwar Nath Tiwari, Resident of Village PODhenuki, P.S.- Panapur, District- Saran Chapra. ... ... Appellant
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Labour Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Principal Secretary, Labour Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Labour Commissioner, Patna.
4.
The Deputy Labour Commissioner, Muzaffarpur.
5.
The Labour Superintendent, Gopalganj.
6.
The Vishnu Sugar Mills Limited, P.O.- Vishnu Sugar Mills, DistrictGopalganj through it's General Manager at Gopalganj 7.
The General Manager, Vishnu Sugar Mills Ltd. Harakhua, DistrictGopalganj. 8.
The Gopalganj Zila Chini Mill Kamgar Union at Vishnu Sugar Mill Gate Harakhua, Gopalganj through its Secretary Uma Shankar Yadav 9.
Uma Shankar Yadav, Secretary, the Gopalganj Zila Chini Mill Kamgar Union at Vishnu Sugar Mill Gate, Harakhua, Gopalganj ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey No-5, Advocate For the Respondents :
Mr.Ajay Kr.Rastogi -AAG 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 07-01-2020 The present memorandum of appeal is directed against the order dated 03.11.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 12519 of 2017 (Subodh Tiwari Vs. The State of Bihar & others) whereby the writ petition has been
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1863 of 2017(5) dt.07-01-2020 2/2 dismissed.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal reserving liberty to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law, including approaching the appropriate Tribunal by way of separate petitions, if so required and desired.
Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BT/- U