Ravi Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38397 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2017 Thana- HAJIPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ravi Sah son of Rameshwar Sah resident of village - Mahmud Chak, P.S. - Nayagaw, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Arbind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 145 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Informant in his fardbeyan has stated that on 05.03.2017 his son Ankit Raohtagi and Dipu Kumar were going on their motorcycle for business purpose and at about 3:30 pm when they reached Pokhra Mohalla Jagdamba Asthan, unknown criminals fired upon them and thereafter they were taken to Sadar Hospital, Hajipur, where they were declared dead. Rs. 22,540/- from the pocket of his son and Rs. 7710/- from the pocket of Dipu Kumar was taken away by the criminals and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38397 of 2018(4) dt.23-08-2018 2/2 they also took away the Scooty.

Petitioner was arrested on 07.03.2017 and his confessional statement was recorded in which he has disclosed that Scooty has been thrown in the well in village Kakra and on said confession petitioner was brought to Saran at about 2:15 am as mentioned in para 46 and 47 of the case diary and scooty was recovered from the well. CDR of recovered mobile was also obtained which shows location of accused petitioner's mobile at the place of occurrence and subsequently mobile location was found at the place of recovery. There are sufficient materials in the case diary against petitioner being involved in double murder case, as such this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner which is accordingly dismissed. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U