Sangita Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Chaitanya Prasad Secretary, Housing Department And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2009 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14817 of 2012 ====================================================== Sangita Singh, Wife of Shri Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Resident of Village - E/7, RBI Colony, P.O. - Lohiya Nagar, P.S. - Kankarbagh, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Chaitanay Prasad Secretary, Housing Department.

2. Lalan Prasad Manjul, Son of Late Sri Ramashish Prasad Singh, Residing at M.I.G. 142, Hanuman Nagar, P.S. - Patrakar Nagar, District - Patna.

3. Smt. Vijay Singh, Wife of Jai Nandan Singh, Resident of Samanpura, P.S. - Behan, District - Darbhanga at present Bikramshila Apartment, Hanuman Nagar, P.S. - Patrakar Nagar, Patna.

4. Sri Mahendra Prasad Singh, Manager, State Housing Board, 6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna.

5. Sri Arvind Prasad Singh, Managing Director, State Housing Board, 6, Sardar Patel Marg, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

M/s Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate :

Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha - AAG 7 For the Housing Board :

Mr. Anshuman Singh, Advocate For the O.P. No.2 :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 01-08-2018 Heard parties.

Second supplementary show cause affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Housing Board.

A cheque bearing No. 027124 dated 31.07.2018 of Bank of India of Rs. 15,40,758/- in favour of petitioner Sangita Singh is handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner.

Patna High Court MJC No.2009 of 2017 dt.01-08-2018 2/2 It is made clear that learned counsel appearing for the original allottee (Respondent-Opposite Party No.2) has again categorically stated that the allottee has no concern with this money which is being given to the petitioner through the aforesaid cheque and he will not raise any dispute with regard to that in future.

However, the present order would not preclude the petitioner, if he intends to assail the decision taken by the Housing Board refusing transfer in his name on whatever ground, before a competent forum.

With the aforesaid observation, this proceeding is dropped.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 03.08.2018 Transmission Date NA