Deepak Paswan @ Dipak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76558 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2024 Thana- TANDWA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
Deepak Paswan @ Dipak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar jSon of Nagendra Ram @ Nagendra Paswan Resident of Ramsagar Bigha, P.S.- Tandwa, Distt.- Aurngabad (Bihar) 2.
Anju Kumari D/O-Nagendra Ram @ Nagendra Paswan Resident of Ramsagar Bigha, P.S.- Tandwa, Distt.- Aurngabad (Bihar) 3.
Sharda Devi wife of Nagendra Ram @ Nagendra Paswan Resident of Ramsagar Bigha, P.S.- Tandwa, Distt.- Aurngabad (Bihar) 4.
Nagendra Ram @ Nagendra Paswan Son fo Jwahar Paswan Resident of Ramsagar Bigha, P.S.- Tandwa, Distt.- Aurngabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aman Vishal Ms. Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 304B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have killed the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76558 of 2024(3) dt.17-01-2025 2/2 specific rather general and omnibus in nature. She submits that the petitioners are in-laws of the deceased. She further submits that husband of the deceased has already surrendered before the learned Trial Court on 25.11.2024 and is in judicial custody. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No.58 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T