Sunil Kumar @ Nepali @ Sunil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74654 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2019 Thana- KOPA District- Saran ====================================================== Sunil Kumar @ Nepali @ Sunil Singh S/o Late Dineshwar Singh Resident of Village- Aami alias Ami, P/S- Dighwara, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kopa Case No.104/2019, registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of three cases and is in custody since 08.03.2025 and the informant alleges that she was intercepted by 2-3 unknown accused, who looted her articles as recorded in the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was against unknown and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of apprehended accused in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value. It is also submitted that since the petitioner has antecedent as such the police got him implicated through the apprehended accused. It is also submitted that charges have been framed against the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74654 of 2025(3) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 by an order dated 12.09.2025 but then trial has not commenced. It is also submitted that petitioner if privilege of bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kopa P.S. Case No.104/2019.

7. Further, one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his mother, namely, Maya Devi.

8. However, it is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T