Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71913/2025bail granted

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-15Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71913 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-611 Year-2025 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Vishal Kumar Son of Kamlesh Kumar Singh R/o Vill. - Pathlauthiuya, P.S. - Bihta, Dist. - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 611/2025 dated 01.08.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 317(5), 318(3), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons were apprehended while going on a nexon car. On inquiry, the said car had a different engine number and chachis number which did not match the records of the D.T.O. It is further alleged that the petitioner and the co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71913 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 2/3 persons are using this vehicle in criminal activities including illegal transportation of liquor. Further, several mobile phones were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the co-accused persons and in all these mobile phones several transactions for payment of bill of illegal liquor was found.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged vehicle. The petitioner has only taken lift from the said vehicle. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 02.08.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the petitioner was found sitting in the stolen vehicle.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bihta

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71913 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 3/3 P.S. Case No. 611/2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T