Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46645/2018bail granted

Ram Narayan Mahto @ Ram Nath Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-03Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46645 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -407 Year- 1988 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Ram Narayan Mahto @ Ram Nath Mahto, son of Ram Ishwar Mahto, resident of Mohalla- Belhar, Gabhtal, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Dular Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 4/ 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Sessions Trial No.587 of 1989 arising out of Danapur P.S. Case No.407 of 1988 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 395 and 412 Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of misuse of privilege of bail.

The petitioner was declared absconder on 08.12.2015 and non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued against him. He has been arrested by the police on 10.03.2018 and since then he is in custody. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report.

This Court finds that the petitioner has sufficiently

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46645 of 2018 (4) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 been punished for the latches on his part.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, II, Danapur, in connection with Sessions Trial No.587 of 1989 arising out of Danapur P.S. Case No.407 of 1988, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.

The petitioner will remain physically present on each and every date of trial and his absence on two consecutive date(s) without any reasonable cause will make his bail bond liable to be cancelled.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- Rohit Kr.

U T