Surajdeo Kumar Yadav @ Surajdeo Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44313 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2018 Thana -JAGDIHSPUR District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Surajdeo Kumar Yadav @ Surajdeo Kumar Singh S/o Brahmdeo Singh @ Brahadev Singh, R/o Vill.- Asani, P.S.- Station- Udwant Nagar, DistritBhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anant Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asharaf Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 147/2018, registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the accused that they forcibly stopped the Tempo and on the gun point looted cash, golden chain, key of the Tempo and other article from the informant and others. It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Name of petitioner surfaced in the case on the basis of confessional statement. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession.

Petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44313 of 2018 (3) dt.19-09-2018 2/2 Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate XI, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 147/2018, subject to the conditions: (1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T