Chandan Mandal v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36553 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2522 Year- 2013 Thana -BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Chandan Mandal Son of Late Suryanarayan Mandal, R/o VillageJagdishpur, P.S.- Dharhara, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Rina Devi W/o Chandan Mandal, D/o Baiju Mandal, R/o R/o Janipur, P.S.- Shahkund, District- Bhagalpur.
.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 2522/2013, for the offence instituted under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of D.P. Act.
The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36553 of 2017 (02) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 2522/2013 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T