← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73125/2022bail granted

Md. Sajjad v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-24Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73125 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2022 Thana- KIUL District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== MD. SAJJAD S/O MD. ANWAR Resident of village- Khagaur, P.O.- and P.S.- Kiul District- Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kiul P.S. Case No. 27 of 2022 dated 22.02.2022 registered for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The F.I.R. named accused persons including the petitioners are alleged to have shot dead the father-in-law of the informant.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R., however, his name transpired in this case on the basis of suspicion during course of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73125 of 2022(3) dt.24-04-2023 2/3 investigation. He further submits that from bare perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that the specific allegation of firing is attributed to the co-accused, Ravikant Yadav, Chhot Kumar @ Manish and Manikant Yadav along with Jonshan. He further submits that the petitioner has not played any role in the alleged occurrence but mere on suspicion, he has been dragged in this case. Moreover, the co-accused, namely, Shiv Kumar has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 11.04.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 74743 of 2022 another co-accused, namely, Sujit Kumar, who is also not named in the F.I.R. has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.12.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 52149 of 2022 and the case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. He further submits that the police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet in this case against the petitioner. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 13.09.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Kiul P.S. Case No. 27 of 2022 with the following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73125 of 2022(3) dt.24-04-2023 3/3

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) brajesh/- U T