Abdul Rahman Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71446 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-576 Year-2025 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.
Abdul Rahman Ansari Son of Sultan Ansari @ Mohammad Sultan Ansari R/o Rampara Momin Tola, P.S.- Katihar, District - Katihar. 2.
Md. Imran Ansari Son of Sultan Ansari @ Mohammad Sultan Ansari R/o Rampara Momin Tola, P.S.- Katihar, District - Katihar. 3.
Irfan Ansari Son of Sultan Ansari @ Mohammad Sultan Ansari R/o Rampara Momin Tola, P.S.- Katihar, District - Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-10-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(4), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant and his wife by means of bat and sword and attempted to kill them.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71446 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/3 behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, petitioners are own brothers of informant and due to petty family feud, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Injuries, sustained by the injured, are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Katihar in connection with Katihar P.S. Case No. 576 of 2025, subject to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71446 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 3/3 condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T