Mathura Ray v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.333 of 2017 In LPA 1815 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Mathura Ray S/o Late Nand Lal Ray, Resident of Village- Japteli, P.S.- Naugachia, District- Bhagalpur .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector, Bhagalpur

3. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Naugachia, District- Bhagalpur.

4. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Naugachia, District- Bhagalpur.

5. The Circle Officer, Naugachia, District- Bhagalpur.

6. Kapildeo Ray S/o Late Deep Narayan Ray, Resident of Village- Japteli, P.S.- Naugachia, District- Bhagalpur.

7. Parmanand Ray

8. Dhurb Ray Both sons of Late Rasik Ray, Resident of Village- Japteli, P.S.- Naugachia, District- Bhagalpur .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Khurshid Alam, AAG XII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-01-2018 Keeping in view the grievance of the petitioner that he was not heard at the time when the matter was taken-up considering the fact that the grievance is with regard to the applicability of Section 27 of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961, and the consideration made by the Collector, Bhagalpur, seems to be ignoring the fact that the petitioner was a bataidar entitled to settle benefit.

We allow this application to its original file (L.P.A. N. 1815 of 2016) to review the order, dated 25.07.2017, and direct for its listing before the appropriate Bench. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) SA/- U