Pandav Das @ Pandav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71373 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2025 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

Pandav Das @ Pandav Kumar S/O Hari Das @ Hari Prasad Das R/O Village- Sanhoula, Police Station- Banka, District- Banka. 2.

Rajendra Kr. Das @ Rajendra Das @ Nanku Das S/O Hari Das @ Hari Prasad Das R/O Village- Sanhoula, Police Station- Banka, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-10-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, attacked informant and his sons by means of sharp edged weapon as a result of which they sustained injuries. It is further alleged that the accused persons also snatched Rs. 5,000/- cash from pocket of informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71373 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/2 previous land dispute between the parties, a simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Petitioner No. 1 has got no criminal antecedents and Petitioner No. 2 has got one criminal antecedent in which he is already on bail.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they, along with other accused persons, assaulted informant and his sons by means of sharp edged weapons. Bare perusal of the injury report reveals that the victims sustained injury on the vital part of body and one of the injuries sustained by injured is grievous in nature.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T