Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66729 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2016 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== PAPPU YADAV Son of Nathuni Yadav Resident of Village- Latru, P.S.- Shivsagar (Baddi), District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 14-01-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Shivsagar (Baddi) PS case no. 171 of 2016 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 384, 386, 506 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 13, 17, 20 of U.A.P.A. Act. The case of the prosecution, in brief is that the accused persons arrived at the construction site of one Contractor namely Rakesh Choubey and told him to stop the work as also had disclosed that they belong to T.P.C. Sangathan and also threatened him with dire consequences, in case he did not pay the extortion money.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and is not named in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66729 of 2019(2) dt.14-01-2020 2/2 F.I.R. and has been falsely implicated in the present case, subsequently. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 21.07.2019. Lastly, it is submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 08.10.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 59879 of 2018 and the one dated 14.08.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 25784 of 2019. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also taking into account the parity of case of the petitioner with that of the co-accused persons who have already been granted bail, I deem it fit and appropriate to release the abovenamed petitioner on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sheosagar (Baddi) PS case no. 171 of 2016.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U T