Dr. Surendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2636 of 2017 ====================================================== Dr. Surendra Kumar, son of Sri Harkha Prasad, resident of LIG- 15/538, Hanuman Nagar, Kankarbagh, Ptrakar Nagar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. R. K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

Mr. Manoj Kumar, the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Dr. Kamar Hasan, the Vice Chancellor Magadha University, Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya. null null 4.

Dr. M.K. Shastri, the Registrar, Magadha University, Bodh Gaya, DistrictGaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. ASHUTOSH RANJAN PANDEY - AAG 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 19-09-2017 Inter alia contending that an order passed on 13.11.2013 in M.J.C. No.1839 of 2012 has not been complied with, this application has been filed for initiating action for contempt. M.J.C. No.1839 of 2012 was filed for initiating action for contempt on account of violation of certain orders earlier passed in a writ petition. After elaborately dealing with the matter, the Court has terminated the proceedings and refused to take any action for contempt, even though certain observations have been made with regard to action to be taken by the State Government.

Patna High Court MJC No.2636 of 2017 dt.19-09-2017 2/2 However, now on going through the contempt application, it is seen that the grievance of the petitioner seems to be because of certain other orders passed after disposal of the contempt application by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 27.2.2017 in Civil Appeal No(s).1678-6181 of 2015 and the order passed by a Division Bench of this Court on 1.8.2017 in L.P.A. No.31 of 2015.

If that be so, for the said purpose the contempt application is not the remedy. In case the petitioner has any grievance with regard to any right accruing to him by virtue of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 27.2.2017 or by the Division Bench of this Court on 1.8.2017, petitioner has to initiate proceedings afresh in accordance with law for ventilating the aforesaid grievance.

With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.Jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 5.10.2017 Transmission Date