Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45971/2017bail granted

Bharat Kumar Ray @ Bharat Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-09Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45971 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -197 Year- 2017 Thana -PATLIPUTRA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Bharat Kumar Ray @ Bharat Kumar Son of Rajendra Ray resident of Mohalla - Mainpura, P.S. Patliputra, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bharat Lal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 337 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that neither the informant has deposited Rs. 1035/- in Bharat pay phone nor there was any dues against the petitioner. The informant never went in the shop of the petitioner and there was no assault to the informant Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45971 of 2017 (3) dt.09-10-2017 2/2 satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-12, Patna, in Patliputra P.S.Case no. 197 of 2017,subject to the conditions as laid down u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or with witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) singh/- U T