← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71696/2025allowed

Anwar Miyan @ Anwar Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-08Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71696 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2024 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Anwar Miyan @ Anwar Ansari S/o Sheikh Saidullah R/o Village- Jaisinghpur Khirwa, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Asha Devi, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered under Sections 272, 273, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 85 litres of illicit liquor kept in jute bag was recovered from the possession of coaccused Vikash Kumar who disclosed that he was transporting the said liquor to supply to the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Further submission is that petitioner has no concern either with the seized liquor or co-accused Vikash Kumar. Nothing has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71696 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/2 been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. Except the confessional statement of apprehended co-accused, there is nothing material against the petitioner. Petitioner has clean antecedent and there is no chance of his absconding or tampering with the evidence. Petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2025 and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No.173 of 2024.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T