M/S Bihar Medical Agency, Nokha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16431 of 2024 ====================================================== M/s Bihar Medical Agency, Nokha Through its Proprietor namely Ranjit Kumar Singh, (Aged about - 50 Years,Male) S/o- Late Sheo Govind Singh @ Late Shiv Govind Choudhary, R/o Village- Sariyawan, P.S.- Nokha, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The State Drug Controller, Director of Drugs Control Administration, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

5.

The Civil Surgeon -Cum- Chief Medical Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 6.

The Assistant Drugs Controller, Rohtas at Sasaram. 7.

The Drugs Inspector, Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjit Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Advocate General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order.

2. Permission is granted. Let the petitioner file an appeal in terms of Rule 66(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945.

3. For a period of 30 days from today the impugned order passed by the licensing authority shall remain stayed. The

Patna High Court CWJC No.16431 of 2024(2) dt.22-09-2025 2/2 petitioner will be at liberty to move the appellate authority for further stay of the impugned order after filing of the appeal. If an application for interim relief is preferred before the appellate authority, the same shall be considered forthwith on its own merits without any delay. In case such application is not considered, the petitioner will be at liberty to move this Court.

4. With the above direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) Bhardwaj/- U