Sujeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48613 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -204 Year- 2016 Thana -BIKRAM District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Sujeet Kumar S/o Shankar @ Shiv Shankar Singh @ Shiv Shankar Kumar, R/o Village- Bery, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 29.11.2016 in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the FIR but subsequently his name has been brought in on the basis of suspicion.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the informant Praveen Kumar did not name any one in the written information, but lodged the case against unknown and subsequently, in his further statement, he made an assertion that an altercation with the petitioner had taken place and, therefore, he had been threatened.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is named

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48613 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 purely on the suspicion, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 204/2016 with the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T