Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41189/2018bail granted

Kewal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-25Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41189 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2018 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Kewal Yadav S/o Late Ruhup Lal Yadav, resident of Village- Bela, P.S. Narpatganj (Basmatiya) District- Araria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar null null .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-09-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 14.03.2018 in connection with Narpatganj (Basmatiya) P.S. Case No. 118/2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 333, 353, 379, 188, 427, 504 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per F.I.R. is of assault to the police personnel by the petitioner and several other accused persons and the specific allegation against the petitioner is of snatching the star of the police personnel.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has remained in custody for more than six months and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and considering the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41189 of 2018 (3) dt.25-09-2018 2/2 aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Araria, in connection with Narpatganj (Basmatiya) P.S. Case No. 118/2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T