Md. Tamanna @ Md. Tamanna Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73581 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Md. Tamanna @ Md. Tamanna Alam S/O Md. Bhanu Miya Resident of Village- Ashapatti Parasauni, Ward No. 6, P.S.- Sahebganj, DistrictMuzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 303(2) of the BNS.
3. Allegedly, on the fateful day, while the informant was cooking food in her house, in the meanwhile, altogether 12 accused persons, including the petitioner, barged into the house and started abusing and assaulting. It is specifically alleged that this petitioner has indiscriminately assaulted the informant over her head due to which she sustained serious injury. There is further allegation against other accused persons of causing assault and snatching of valuable.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73581 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/3
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the FIR has been instituted against 12 named accused persons, including the petitioner, with the specific accusation against the petitioner of causing assault over the head. The injury, which is allegedly sustained to the informant over her head, has been found to be simple in nature in view of the injury report, which clearly suggests no significant intracranial abnormality. The genesis of the occurrence is said to be a land dispute. Moreover the petitioner bears fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court and would not indulge in such activity in future.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the specific accusation of causing assault and thereby corresponding injury clearly suggests the complicity of the petitioner in the crime.
6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note of the nature of injury as discussed in the injury report, besides the fair antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73581 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Court No. 4, Muzaffarpur (West) in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U T