Ram Pravesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65545 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2015 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAM PRAVESH SINGH Son of Jotnarayan Singh Resident of VillageMoglania, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 17-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 38 of 2015 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 448, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., IV, Motihari, East Champaran.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case is of the year 2015, there is land dispute between both the parties. Petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2019. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail submits that after rejection of anticipatory
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65545 of 2019(3) dt.17-12-2019 2/2 bail the petitioner did not surrender on his own for about 2 1⁄2 years and has been taken on remand in connection with another case.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein this case is of the year 2015 in which even after rejection of the prayer for anticipatory bail in the year 2017, the petitioner did not surrender on his own for a period of about 2 1⁄2 years and has been taken on remand in this case only when he was arrested in connection with another case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he had given a gun shot injury to the informant on the vital part of his body which was grievous in nature, this court is not inclined to grant regular bail at this stage. Petitioner may, however, renew his prayer for bail after a reasonable period if the trial is not proceeded with. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T