Laxman Mahto @ Lakshman Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53136 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2017 Thana -BARAULI District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Laxman Mahto @ Lakshman Mahto, Son of Late Shivdhari Mahto, Resident of Village- Rupanchhap Police Station- Barauli, DistrictGopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Reena Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Barauli P.S.ae No.65 of 2017 G.R.No.1429 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of assault to the informant causing injury to him.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is case and counter case between the parties and though it is alleged that he has assaulted on the right hand but the injuries have been found on the left hand, which are grievous in nature. The petitioner is the brother of the informant and he is in custody since 26.7.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53136 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.-XIV, Gopalganj in connection with Barauli P.S.Case No.65 of 2017 G.R.No.1429 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T