Satyam Kumar Singh @ Satyam Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77113 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-323 Year-2022 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Satyam Kumar Singh @ Satyam Singh Son of Dileep Kumar Singh @ Dileep Singh village- Chatar, po- Babhangawan, Ps- Barhara, Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Parijat Saurav, Adv.

Mr. Ritesh Abhishek, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kr. No.1, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Koliwar P.S. Case No. 323 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with one co-accused snatched mobile phone and blue tooth of the informant and when he objected, co-accused fired upon him due to which he sustained injury on chest.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. The name of the petitioner has disclosed in this case on confessional statement of co-accused Ravishankar Kumar. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. It

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77113 of 2024(2) dt.13-11-2024 2/2 is further submitted that petitioner has clean antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is serious allegation against the petitioner and he does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

8. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seeks regular bail, the learned Court below shall pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) annpurna/- U T