← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75298/2019dismissed

Kamal Kumar @ Chintu Kumar @ Chintu @ Sri Kamal Kumar @ Pintu v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-13Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75298 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2013 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Kamal Kumar @ Chintu Kumar @ Chintu @ Sri Kamal Kumar @ Pintu Son of Sri Prakash Yadav Resident of Village and Post - Bhelar, P.S.- Dharhara, District - Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Indeshwari Prasad Mandal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Dalsingsarai (D. Sarai) P.S. Case No.174 of 2013, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 364, 365, 366, 302, 368, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is said to have killed/sold/concealed the daughter of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is of the year 2013 but petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail petition in 2019. It is further submitted that the petitioner has go no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75298 of 2019(3) dt.13-12-2021 2/2 petition.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that from perusal of the FIR, it appears that there is specific allegation against the petitioner.

Having considered the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below within four weeks from today and the learned court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner preferably on the same day without being prejudiced from the order of this Court.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T