Paras Singh @ Anupam Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72916 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-526 Year-2022 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== PARAS SINGH @ ANUPAM KUMAR SINGH Son of Shyamal Kishor Singh Residence of village - Brahampur, P.S.- Supaul, Bairo, District - Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brajesh Prasad Gupta, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-03-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 447, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. The prosecution story, in brief, is that petitioner along with accused persons came at the door of the Manoj Sharma and started abusing. They opened fire from their pistols. One shot was fired by co-accused Rohit Singh, which hit on the neck of the informant's mother. The injured Somni Devi was brought to Sadar Hospital, Supaul, where she was declared dead by the doctor. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72916 of 2022(2) dt.24-03-2023 2/2 specific allegation against one Rohit Singh is that he fired upon the mother of the informant as a result of which she died. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. The petitioner has been involved in this case only on the basis of suspicion and on the basis of inadmissible evidence. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner was involved in the alleged occurrence. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 526 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T