Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80637 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-254 Year-2022 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Nitish Kumar Son Of Triveni Ray Resident Of Village - Ward No.-14, Bazidpur Meari, Police Station - Sarairanjan, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 379, 307, 354, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 254 of 2022.
3. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner and other accused person is of assaulted the informant and cut the left hand of the son of the informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent mentioned in Para 3 of the bail application. The allegation against the petitioner and other accused person is that he cut the left hand of the son of the informant by means of Tengari and also assaulted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80637 of 2023(2) dt.18-12-2023 2/2 the informant. The injury is found to be grievous in nature. The present FIR is lodged after delay of one month. There is no explanation of such delay.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner was also involved in the occurrence.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also injury is found to be grievous in nature, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands dismissed.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Ranjeet/- U T