Dilip Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75718 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2023 Thana- KAMTAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Dilip Das Son Of Nathuni Das Resident Of Village- Malpatti, P.S.- Kamtaul, District- Darbhanga 2.

Chandan Sharama @ Chandan Kumar Sharma Son Of Late Suresh Sharma Resident Of Malpatti, Ps- Kamtaul, Dist.- Darbhanga 3.

Vijay Kumar Mahto Son Of Naresh Mahto Resident Of Malpatti, PsKamtaul, Dist.- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tej Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 366, 363, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of abducting the daughter of the informant, when she was alone in her house.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They have committed no offence. The victim girl has been recovered

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75718 of 2023(2) dt.29-11-2023 2/2 and her statement recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C., in which she whispered about the complicity of co-accused Ganesh Dhankar, who forcibly taken away her to Samastipur and filled vermillion (sindoor) in her forehead. She further stated that the co-accused Ganesh Dhankar, kept her in a room. There is no specific overt act against these petitioners. He further submitted that the other co-accused has already been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 19.07.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41555 of 2023. They are languishing in judicial custody since 25.08.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Darbhanga in connection with Kamtaul P.S. Case No. 22 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T