Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Bhushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71908 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Bhushan Kumar Son of Dharmvir Kumar @ Viru Pandit Resident of village - Doiya, P.S.- Noorsarai, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravinder Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The allegation in the First Information Report is that in the marriage ceremony of the nephew of the informant, a dispute arose with regard to dancing on the D.J. and in course of such altercation the accused persons Aditya Kumar, Ravi Kumar (petitioner) along with four to five other unknown persons engaged in assaulting the nephew of the informant causing serious injuries to him for which he was taken to the PMCH where he died on 18.12.2024 during course of treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits at the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71908 of 2025(3) dt.17-11-2025 2/3 outset that on a very trivial issue, the altercation had started and the petitioner who is the brother of the bride whose marriage was taking place could not be said to be involved in any activity of such serious nature. It is also a fact that the F.IR. was lodged after a delay of four days only after death of the deceased had taken place. It is further submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather the allegation are general and omnibus in nature. Further, it is pointed out that vide Annexure P/3, the informant after knowing the correct facts that the petitioner was involved in the marriage arrangement and was not responsible for the said incident has filed an affidavit to that effect before the learned court concerned.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the grant of bail.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault against the petitioner, with no intention or motive having been alleged, coupled with the fact that there is delay in lodging the F.I.R. and the chargesheet has been submitted, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71908 of 2025(3) dt.17-11-2025 3/3 satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Ranjeet/- U T