Md. Sahroj Alam @ Sahroj Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72460 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2025 Thana- KOCHADHAMAN District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Md. Sahroj Alam @ Sahroj Alam S/O Abdul Mobeen R/O Village - Bagalbari, P.S- Kochadhaman, Distt.- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghwendra Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-11-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that thieves entered his house at 11 pm on 5-6-2025 and committed theft of gold and silver jewelleries along with mobile, further he informed the villagers about the theft and started enquiring when he found an empty box stolen from his house in which jewelleries were kept near a newly constructed house, thus based on suspicion alleges that petitioner along with his associates committed the occurrence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72460 of 2025(2) dt.12-11-2025 2/3 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that date of occurrence is 5-62025 and the FIR came to be instituted on 28-6-2025, i.e., after a delay of 23 days without any plausible explanation. It is further submitted that entire allegation hinges around suspicion. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 268 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

7.

However, it is made clear that in the event, if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72460 of 2025(2) dt.12-11-2025 3/3 learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner, despite giving assurance to this Court, is not cooperating in the investigation, in that event, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. 8.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned police station through the learned Trial Court. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T