Mukesh Ranjan v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42353 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4440 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Mukesh Ranjan son of Sri Binod Kumar Sinha resident of mohalla - Mahabir Nagar (Behind MIG), Hanuman Nagar, P.S.Kankarbagh, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shyam Nandan Pd. Singh son of Sri Anand Bhushan Singh resident of mohalla Ranighat, P.O. Mahendru, P.S. Sultanganj, District Patna & A/P Bhushan Medical Hall, Vrindawan Nursing Home, Salimpur Ahra, P.O. G.P.O.., P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District Patna.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 4440(c) of 2013 registered under Sections 420 of the I.P.C. and 138 of the N.I. Act pending in the Court of A.C.J.M., Patna.

Submission is that petitioner is a distributor of the company. He is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to ill motive.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that there is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42353 of 2017 (4) dt.23-11-2017 2/2 direct allegation against the petitioner and the witnesses have also supported the prosecution case.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this application is rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Shailendra/- U T