Chandani Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73316 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2021 Thana- PARBATTA District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

CHANDANI DEVI Wife of Mukesh Yadav @ M.P. Yadav Resident of Village- Gouarchak, P.S.- Parbatta, District- Bhagalpur, presently residing at Babupur, P.S.- Sabour, District- Bhagalpur 2.

MUKESH YADAV @ M.P. YADAV Son of Bachchi Yadav Resident of Village- Babupur, P.S.- Sabour, District- Bhagalpur 3.

SINTU YADAV @ AMIT YADAV Son of Dilip Yadav Resident of VillageBhawanipur (Pratap Chowk), P.S.- Rangra (Gopalpur), District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 128 of 2021 registered under sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case relates to commission of murder of the elder daughter of the informant by the co-accused persons including this petitioners.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case because of they are close relative of the husband of the deceased. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no concern with the mess and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73316 of 2022(4) dt.15-05-2023 2/2 business of the deceased. Similarly situated other accused person has already been enlarged on bail by another coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated6.4.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 67664 of 2022. Moreover, they are languishing in judicial custody for more than nine months.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the custody of the petitioners, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 128 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Naugachia, District-Bhagalpur.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U