Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49456/2018dismissed

Masoom Ali @ Mashoom Ali v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-04Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49456 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -127 Year- 2018 Thana -BARAULI District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Masoom Ali @ Mashoom Ali Son of Abdul Wahid Ansari @ Abdul Vahid Resident of Village - Milkiya (Milki Biraicha), P.S. - Barauli, District - Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-10-2018 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Barauli P.S.Case No.127 of 2018for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 420, 406, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner as per FIR is that the petitioner is Driver of the informant and he has taken the vehicle to Siwan along with Bhabhi of the informant for her treatment and thereafter he left her there and came back with the vehicle and when the informant asked for the vehicle, as the condition of his bhabh deteriorated, on one plea or the other he refused to come and thereafter she was taken to Lucknow by another vehicle and after returning when the informant asked the petitioner to return

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49456 of 2018 (3) dt.04-10-2018 2/2 the vehicle, he informed that he has sold the vehicle. He has also committed mar-pit with the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the informant was accused in a case and he had gone to Jail custody and when he returned he was implicated in this case. He is in custody since 25.5.2018.

Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant..

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T